Friday, May 17, 2013

"THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN REMOVED BY THE USER"

The studio version of the "Lonnie Dunn Traveling Salvation Show" has been taken down.

The group-grope is still up here.

Lonnie's part of the tribal chant starts up at 19:22 and runs a little past 21:30.  You can just slide the little bead to about 19:20.

Here's the part I don't understand, if one is proud of something like this, why would one take it down, once it has been called to the public's attention?

Your input would be appreciated.

Many of you are looking for my post on "The Scotty" tournament and Scott Glasgow in general.  It'll go up over the weekend.  This little tidbit preempted it.


Thursday, May 16, 2013

LILLIPUTIANS IN THE SECOND TERM: GROWNUPS LONG TIME GONE.

Today, let's look at the IRS, AP and State Department controversies as symptoms.

Yes, I know that our Republican friends will say "Yeah, symptoms of democrats always being corrupt and overreaching."  If we take a historical look at all this, the second term of the Eisenhower administration gave birth to the military-industrial complex that Ike could caution us against but not do anything about.  The second term of of the Nixon Administration was a Plumbers' crack. (Yes, the apostrophe is in the correct place.)  The second term of the Reagan administration gave us a good guy losing his grasp and the Iran-Contra thuggery, coverup and other Meeses. (and I guess messes.)  The second term of the Clinton Administration gave us biological evidence and a president so toxic (at the time) that Al Gore (I believe incorrectly) ran away from him.  The second term of the Bush administration gave us endless war and the "Big Short".

Second term vaporlock is a bi-partisan disease.

Oh, there a lots of theories why.  The favorite seems to be that the legislative agenda becomes impossible as soon as the next election is in sight.  Some folks like the Hubris theory and some go big for the post-election exhaustion theory.  All have merit but I have my own special favorite.

All the grownups go home in the second term.  There is no buffer to the Valerie Jarretts and Oliver Norths.  You can tolerate overzealous and political amateur types when there are professionals in the building.  When the professionals go home and the kids become principal decision-makers you are in trouble.

Why would Clinton go get Dale Bumpers at the end if Cheryl Mills had everything under control?  Why did Baker have to come back for Reagan.  Why did it take so long for Bush to off Rumsfeld?

Getting grownups to join a second term effort is difficult.  Getting zealots and amateurs, full of piss and vinegar but lacking in judgment is easy.  Imbuing them with judgment and wisdom seems out of reach.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

AP CAPER COMMENTARY: ARE YOU STUPID OR DO YOU THINK WE ARE?

OK, the DOJ subpoenaed a buttpile of phone contacts from a journalistic organization.  Conceded that's a big deal.  Conceded that the White House has butchered the response.  None of that is my point today.

ALL the networks are bringing on "experts" to describe the situation.  All the "experts" describe, in loving detail, how there exists this "tension" between the Press and the Government's prosecution arm.  Each and every one of them looks so proud of himself as he explains this tension, as if he is revealing one of the great mysteries of the universe.  In fact, they are explaining "Milk comes from cows."

Look, this is a "No shit, Sherlock." situation.  The tension has been in play since the Republic was founded.  The drafters acknowledged the tension by making the First Amendment, well, first.  Uh, guys, it's been around since 1791.  This conflict of doctrine was refined during Watergate.  There is nothing new under the sun.

The First Amendment is first because it addresses the most critical and easily anticipated problem.  The American people get that.  They do not Howie Kurtz, Larry Tribe or Jeanine Pirro to absorb that principle.

To the networks, I would say.  Get better experts.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

CHIP


As one might expect from my age and military experience, I normally handle the whole death and the grieving thing relatively gracefully.

Not this time. So many really bright people have written so many insightful things about Parker/Chip/Tookie that I am ashamed to admit I could not even compose myself to attempt the task until my young friend was buried.

Understand at the outset that any close friend of Chip's explaining Chip would be something like Dr. Timothy Leary explaining an acid trip. Being close to him was unreal, too real and surreal all at once. He was, at once, brilliant and learning disabled, polite and crude, resolute and maddeningly indecisive, open and cautious, dedicated and distracted.  He was all of us--all of our good and not so good traits-- with the volume knob turned up.  And we loved him all the more for it.

He often told whomever would listen that he suffered from both dyslexia and ADHD. I have not even the foggiest notion where he got that diagnosis but how he reacted to it was instructive. He would bring me books that he had completed and say "I have to read five or six books a week or else my dyslexia and ADHD get worse. You read these and then I'll read them again and will discuss them." At the same time, we would both read statistical matters and his memory of what we had read would far exceed mine. I was skeptical about the whole dyslexia and ADHD thing.  On top of that, he would have a mature and well thought out interpretation of the stats we were reviewing.

It is true that his thought process would sometimes tire and his mind would go to some new shiny object, leaving our discussion someplace utterly unintended.

He knew I didn't care.

That he was somewhat easily distracted madeTwitter the perfect medium for him. In fact one of my first thoughts when I learned of his death was, selfishly, "there will ever be another SEC football game where I tweet my way through it with Chip." The very limitations of time and space imposed by twitter put it right into Chip's "sweet spot."  He was the Prince of the Twitterverse.

As I said earlier, it's impossible to describe the intensity of a close friendship with this man. I will just tell you two stories that capture a little bit of him and leave it at that.

In early 2002 we were working on a project together, we were either on the telephone or at my house every night. Predictably, we would get sidetracked with SEC football talk or local gossip or politics. Around the end of February, the intense work on the project was nearly completed. There was not nearly the constant need to meet or talk as much.

Almost on cue, I suffered a temporarily disabling illness. By March, I was hooked up to an IV and confined to a bed or couch. I kept my illness very quiet, being self-employed. About the second night of the whole ordeal, Chip shows up at my front door with the penultimate draft of our project and wants to discuss several very un-Chip things like font styles and margin sizes. The next night, the same thing. He literally wanted to discuss where to put the commas.  And so it continued for nearly 2 months, Chip thinking he was fooling me that his visits were business and not convalescent calls and me, appreciating his kindness but not letting him know I was aware of his benevolent ruse.  Chip cheering me up but leaving me my dignity and keeping my secret.  When it was over, we never spoke of it again.

The other incident happened in about 2008. We were in a public place and, by sheer chance, Chip witnessed two people that he really liked commit a drunken, gratuitous act of bigotry. He was also fond of the victims of this act of bigotry. He didn't hesitate in taking sides. He called out the bigoted action and let the offenders know in no uncertain terms that they needed to leave the victims alone. It was interesting to see how my old Sunday school pupil and ballplayer had, at some point, decided what his standards were and what kind of man he wanted to be. Aside from being a bit worried how I was going to have to pull him off of these guys, I was proud of him. When we talked about it a few days later, I told him his sense of justice was a credit to his mom and dad but that is conflict resolution skills could use a little improvement.  We both laughed.

There are 1 million ways to describe Chip, all comprehensively inadequate. All I know for sure is that it will be years before I stop reaching for the phone in an impulse to share with Chip the ironies of football, politics, the neighborhood, the business environment and the geist that surrounds the place where he lived and that he loved.

As I said on Twitter, and he is already inside the pearly gates because SEC guys go in the first round.

Too soon gone, Chipper.  Roll Tide!

Sunday, May 12, 2013

OH, WAIT: JUST FOUND THIS SOIREE FROM "ONMYHONOR"

Again, no dispute with the BSA's right to keep its current policies and no quarrel with those who will withdraw from BSA if the policy changes.  Whatever gets one up in the morning.

But the arguments are instructive.

This is a 37 minute "I'll pretend to listen to you if  you'll pretend to listen to me" fest.  I suggest you watch some of it, especially the women, then slide to about minute 19-21:30 to see Mr. Dunn's less edited version.

To view the vid click here.

I am nearly speechless.

VIDEO: HONESTLY SOLICITING YOUR SERIOUS COMMENTS (Please read the preamble before you watch the vid.)

I understand the BSA is reconsidering their "closet gays only" policy and there has been a more permissive one circulated.  I understand that everyone, even a prospective public official, is entitled to personal views on this topic.  Certainly, most legal scholarship and case law supports the right of the BSA as an NGO to restrict its membership pretty much any way it wants.

Don't care to debate any of that here.  What I want to know--and please comment here rather than on FB or Twitter--your impressions, your reactions to what you see.  I do not want to argue about it, although I may later share mine.  I guess the  ultimate question is "how do you feel watching this?"

Click here to watch video (Just a bit more than two minutes).

Whether you feel the topic is the role of a scoutmaster, the rights of  NGOs, the speaker's grasp of adult sexual behavior or just "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?," please comment here, as opposed to in the social media. I seriously and earnestly want to here from anyone who will kindly share his or her views on this.

I know what Tookie would have said.

Saturday, May 11, 2013

DOCTOR, I GET THESE TERRIBLE HEADACHES

Here is what is hurting my head today.  There are all these experts out there commenting on security protocols for diplomatic outposts.  Some of them could probably even pull Benghazi off a pin map.

That's fine.  I like to learn stuff from real experts.

But, if they are so expert in the protection of diplomatic personnel and missions, why are all their posts, statuses and comments Cut and Paste Jobs?

Friday, May 10, 2013

SPONTANEOUS GUEST EDITORIAL

Among the comments I rec'd yesterday was a very long one from someone I respect greatly and have worked with and against.  Before I could publish his long comment, he wrote again and asked me to pull it.  This is the last thought in a much longer narrative and I thought it was worth reposting and I do with his permission.   Except for cleaning up his grammar a bit, it is verbatim.  

With all the interesting things going on in the world (Benghazzi, Quincy Park District Westview Tempest, Illinois Pension Wars), I had no intention of writing today about City Politics or its interesting governing techniques.  This one is really not about anything but how a friend treats and friend.  The author's outrage on behalf of the Havermale family is very authentic:






Mr. Moore..... If you're reading this..... COUNT THE FREAKING VOTES BEFORE YOU PUT SOMEONES FAMILY NAME IN FRONT OF THE SCRUTINY OF THE MEDIA!!!!! You did the Havermale family (who are very good people) a great injustice by not finding out whether you had the support to put Paul in.  You opened their family up to unnecessary ridicule by handling this in a rookie manner. The media wouldn't have touched this issue until you announced his name. You further failed by having an alderman deliver the news to Mr. Havermale that the votes on his nomination weren't there.  Even if you're an unskilled politician, you could have been a faithful friend.