Wednesday, January 10, 2007

VILSACK SPEECH AND THE HIDDEN, CONSTANT COST OF WAR

In his last "Condition of the State" speech Gov. Vilsack urged the legislature to pass a resolution calling for a prompt end to the adventure in Iraq. He spoke of the impact on the Iowa and its communities.

At about the same time the General Accounting Office was estimating that just the care of disabled and disturbed veterans over their lifetimes will be from $350B to $850B, not including other veterans already in the system or to be placed in the system from other adventures. Of course, if history is any teacher, the Gov't will continue to redefine who gets benefits, shrink the benefit and slow play the recipients. Still, it's a whopping debt we owe our own sons and daughters. I surely didn't hear anybody...and I mean anybody....talking about this before we went in.

That's before the States do their part and that total doesn't include what some of the rehabilitated vets will cost their own private insurance carriers if they are deferred or refused by the VA.

And, of course, it doesn't begin to cover the human suffering.

Maybe we could have done the cost-benefit analysis better if we had clearly defined the specific, measurable goals we were trying to achieve.

Labels:

4 Comments:

At 9:51 AM, January 11, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"a resolution calling for a prompt end to the adventure in Iraq"

What exactly does that mean?

 
At 10:43 AM, January 11, 2007, Blogger UMRBlog said...

Beats hell out of me. I only used it for a predicate to talk about GAO's projection of costs directly from this war for which there is no current appropriation.

I'll be writing about my own opinion on war plans in a few days. Then, if you want, you can tee me up on my own thoughts, rather than my incidental paraphrase of someone else's

TYFCB

 
At 7:57 PM, January 13, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Instead of focusing on Baghdad where the real civil war is taking place - what would happen if the focus was on the borders and the Anbar province? Al Qaeda is operating in the Anbar province. What if the 20,000 where sent there instead of Baghdad? How about moving the seat of government until the sects come to some resolution? The Continental Congress moved from Philadelphia when the British took the city during the Revolution. Is the current Iraqi government more advanced than our Continental government? Just a few thoughts. The current plan is not even one sidestep from the original plan. We need to shatter this paradigm and find a new plan – the current leadership is incapable of thinking of Iraq outside of their philosophy.

 
At 12:37 PM, January 14, 2007, Blogger Barbara said...

Um gov doleto? Zentoy, lo comicork ma voce!!! Jusa rea emb banzinhortei oggenhou versos ha kafognidam. Da ondo, wen zentea de, vedo chor...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home